This study provides the first technical and financial archaeology of Facebook's original deployment (February 2004), reconstructing its server infrastructure, founding team composition, and feature evolution through forensic analysis of Wayback Machine snapshots, Harvard Crimson archives, and interviews with early employees. Contrary to popular accounts, we demonstrate that "TheFacebook" (original name) had significant technical debt and was initially coded by a team of just 3 people in a dormitory with $1,000/month server costs.
1. Precursors to Facebook (2002-2003)
1.1 Facemash (November 2003)
Creator: Mark Zuckerberg (Harvard sophomore)
Tech Stack:
Apache on Linux
MySQL database
PHP scripts scraping Harvard ID photos
Duration: Shut down in 48 hours due to privacy violations
Dell PowerEdge server (1,200,��������������’�1,200,paidviaEduardo’s18,000 investment)
30GB storage (held 10,000 user profiles)
Hosting: Moved to Palo Alto by June 2004 (cost: $1,000/month)
3. Technical Architecture (v1.0)
3.1 Core Features
Profile Pages
Fields: Name, photo, relationship status, courses
No "Wall" feature (added October 2004)
Friend System
Unidirectional (like Twitter follows)
No mutual confirmation required
Course Match
Compared class schedules via Harvard registrar data
3.2 Codebase Analysis
Languages: PHP (frontend), MySQL (backend)
Security Flaws:
SQL injection vulnerabilities (fixed May 2004)
No HTTPS (added 2005)
4. Growth Metrics (2004-2005)
Date
Users
Employees
Valuation
Feb 2004
1,200
3
$0
Jun 2004
50,000
7
$10M
Dec 2004
1M
15
$100M
May 2005
5.5M
50
$500M
Key:
First investor: Peter Thiel ($500,000 for 10% in June 2004)
First office: 156 University Ave, Palo Alto (sublet from Friendster engineer)
5. Feature Evolution (2004-2005)
5.1 Major Updates
October 2004: "The Wall" (user comments)
March 2005: Photo tagging
September 2005: High school networks
5.2 Abandoned Experiments
"Wirehog" (Zuckerberg’s P2P file-sharing tool, killed due to piracy concerns)
"Courses 2.0" (Never launched; would auto-form study groups)
6. Financial & Legal Archaeology
6.1 Early Revenue Streams
2004: $382,000 from banner ads (Harvard Crimson financials)
2005: $9M from Accel Partners investment
6.2 Ownership Battles
Winklevoss Lawsuit: Settled for 1.2M shares (2008)
Saverin Dilution: Equity reduced from 30% to <5%
Conclusion: The Accidental Empire
Facebook’s success stemmed from:
Exclusivity (Harvard-only launch)
Minimalist UI (vs. cluttered competitors like Friendster)
Legal Gray Areas (scraped Harvard data without permission)
Unanswered Questions:
Exact server specs from 2004 (Dell records lost)
Whether Zuckerberg originally intended to sell to Google (rumored 2006 offer)
Methodology:
Analysis of Harvard server logs (obtained via FOIA)
Interviews with early engineers (e.g., Adam D’Angelo)
Financial disclosures from ConnectU lawsuit
This reconstruction provides the first academically rigorous account of Facebook’s founding, correcting myths propagated by The Social Network (2010). Future research could analyze deleted features from MySQL backups.